Just a few days ago, The New York Times published an article about the health risks associated with blogging. Here's the introduction:
They work long hours, often to exhaustion. Many are paid by the piece — not garments, but blog posts. This is the digital-era sweatshop. You may know it by a different name: home.A growing work force of home-office laborers and entrepreneurs, armed with computers and smartphones and wired to the hilt, are toiling under great physical and emotional stress created by the around-the-clock Internet economy that demands a constant stream of news and comment.
Of course, the bloggers can work elsewhere, and they profess a love of the nonstop action and perhaps the chance to create a global media outlet without a major up-front investment. At the same time, some are starting to wonder if something has gone very wrong. In the last few months, two among their ranks have died suddenly.
The content of the article is making the rounds and eliciting reactions. Perez Hilton weighed in with his thoughts on CNN. And while some bloggers think the article serves as an important warning, others think the Times took the story in the wrong direction.
Immediately, I see a connection between the trends described in the article and the problems with the new career ideal. But, I'm still mulling over my thoughts.
I was curious about how other Generation Y bloggers' reacted to the article. Did it arouse concern that we could meet the same fate as some of the bloggers it mentioned? Or are we better at handling blogging demands because we've grown up in a multi-tasking our way through an information-saturated society?
I sent out some e-mails and I've pasted responses below. Please note, the responses below appear in the form that I received them and were not edited.
-------------------------------
From Rebecca Thorman:
Stupid, stupid, stupid. For Gen Yers, it isn't blogging that's bad for our health, it's our work ethic. We get a bad rap for it, but really we work ridiculously hard because there's so much to do. We want to check off everything. And most of us are depressed in one way or another as the result of all these choices. Blogging is one way to take a hold of all that and gain a bit of control and feel as if we might actually be making a difference.
From Jennifer Robinson:
I can understand what it’s like to be overcommitted to blog writing. I have been writing blogs for a few years. Looking back, I can see the evolution of my writing and blog styles. When in college, I blogged about personal topics. Now, I am inspired by my day job and write about business and professional development.
In all, I actively contribute to four blogs and have a couple of blogs on the back burner. When life gets busy, it’s easy for me to let my blogs’ content or posts suffer because I’m not doing it for the money (and if I didn’t have a day job, I would try to make more off of blogging). I contribute to blogs because I have passion for community, collaboration, and the sharing of information. My blogs don’t take over my life nor do blogs take over the life of many bloggers I know.
The behavior portrayed in the NYT article makes me think the blog authors who suffered severe health problems became obsessed with blogging. Always be cautious of the balance between passion and obsession. Obsession is never healthy. The people in the article happened to be obsessive and they happened to be bloggers. Heart attacks were around long before blogging. Hearing how it may have contributed to death helps raise awareness.
From Ryan Paugh:
The truth is it doesn't surprise me. I'd be a liar if I said I have an easy time managing my "work life" and my "life life."
Personally, I don't have the ability to let it come to lack of sleep, becoming isolated and basically strapped to a computer. I love real interaction way too much. But it's easy to become addicted. Especially when money is involved. Not to mention he ego trip when a post makes it big.
Still, these two guys who passed away tragically were not members of Gen Y. I always got the impression that the reason we work so hard now is so we can not work so hard later. At least that's what I'm trying to do.
By age 50-60 I don't want to be strapped to a laptop, sacrificing my physical and mental health. I want to be enjoying my family, friends and some well-earned rest.
From Monica O'Brien:
-------------------------------
Rebecca, Jennifer and Monica seem to think that the blogs aren't entirely to blame, rather it's the way the medium is used. Ryan points out that because this sort of work isn't well suited for older people, we're doing it now so that we can relax when we're in our 50s.
What do you think? Do you agree with Rebecca, Jennifer, Ryan or Monica's thoughts? Or is there something else we should be focusing on?


9 comments:
Ryan's comment was interesting I thought - he seems to be describing the old work ideal. I.e., where you work all the time and then at the end of your life you relax. I think you should lead the life you want to lead now. If you want to spend time with friends and family, do. If you want to work hard, do. If you want to do both, then by all means, show the rest of us how it's done.
I think this article about blogging highlights the old work ideal. Generation Y should be blazing the trail for the new work ideal.
Hey, thanks for lumping me in with Gen Y. Makes me feel young again.
"Death by Blogging" is a silly concept. I'm with Rebecca: "Stupid, stupid, stupid.". Clearly they were just trying to get a story...
I agree that our generation has grown up in such a "busy" (for lack of a better word) environment that we've become expert multitaskers.
Several Boomers and Xers I know are constantly amazed that I can be talking to them, chatting on MSN, working on a document AND noticing the pretty girls passing by, all at the same time!
We're such good multitaskers that I wouldn't worry too much about any of us dying from blogging... :)
Thanks for the article though, it's amazing what some people will do for publicity!
Michelle Goodman adds her two cents over at The Anti 9-to-5 Guide. Check it out.
@Rebecca: I think you're right. My comments do sort of portray old ideals. Possibly too much for my liking. Thanks for pointing it out.
I think the real story here is not "death by blogging" but death by a terrible work ethic. Multitasking and increases productivity has it's benefits, but how often does it encourage us to keep doing more and more even at the expense of our own health.
It's easy to not take seriously now, while we're young and healthy. But a time will come where "work, work, work" with effect our bodies in a negative way.
Okay, so I jokingly call myself a 'blog slave' but I'm not remotely Gen Y, go figure.
Nevertheless, I think you've tapped into the zeitgeist of the 'disease to please' and unhealthy work ethics because we perceive that people come to rely upon us for our views as a source of vital information...
Or...well...we THINK they do.
Maybe that's our self-important trumped up POV on same to justify our existence, and our need to feel needed & worthy...I dunno. Gotta ask a shrink. ;-)
Would the world come to an end if we didn't blog a day and got outside for some R&R and sunshine? I think not.
We're busy, multi-taskers because that's what drives us and nourishes us...It's a personality type more than an age or an acumen, imho.
I've had colleagues tease me about being "the only nonprofit founder who will be discovered slumped over her desk, dead of exhaustion, with her golden retriever dropping tennis balls on her head hoping for 'more swims and strokes'...
Ahem, we can learn a lot from dogs; gonna take tmrw. off for some vitamin D and outdoor play...
Great post!
I read this article awhile ago as I work in PR and many of my colleagues dealt with Russell Shaw on a regular basis. I do agree that people can get stressed out over any sort of demanding writing activity, but I dont' think that blogging it itself is dangerous. In my view, Russell Shaw fell into the category of the overworked journalist, who just happened to blogging. I really feel that professional journalists who blog suffer the pitfalls and pressure of the journalism environment, which is more to blame for the 2 recent deaths than the blogospher itself.
I saw that article as well. You have to remember that the NYT is about as old school as you can get, that blogging is seen as a threat by those who write the paper and they don't really understand the phenomenon.
The work that gets done and how it gets done is qualitatively different than anything any generation has ever seen, but in the long run hard work is hard work, whether it's banging out blogs or breaking rocks. There will be health risks associated with both.
I'm a Gen X blogger - I remember when we were coming of age, the baby boomers were concerned about the Gen X "slacker." Now that Gen X has moved into leadership positions, curiously we're not slackers, we're just very interested in Work/Life balance. Perspective...it's all perspective.
Andre just wrote a thoughtful post about this issue at Pulse & Signal. Check it out.
Post a Comment